Korea’s Military Manpower Administration, or MMA, viewing his US naturalization in 2002 as a deliberate attempt to evade compulsory military duty, has banned him from entering Korea.
But the Supreme Court of Korea sees procedural flaws in the decision by the Korean Consulate General in Los Angeles to deny Yoo an F-4 residency visa.Yoo evades active duty, gets banned from Korea
Contrary to his repeated affirmations on television that he would fulfill his mandatory military duty, Yoo became a naturalized US citizen in 2002 just before he was to be drafted.
A month later, the MMA slapped Yoo with an entry ban on the grounds of “safeguarding the interests and safety of the state” pursuant to the immigration law. As a result, the Justice Ministry added his name to a list of people banned from Korea. In June 2003, however, the ministry issued a permit allowing Yoon to make a temporary visit so he could mourn the death of his fiancee’s father.
In October 2015, the singer petitioned the Korean court to reverse the LA Consulate General’s decision not to issue him an F-4 visa.
Given to overseas Koreans who either once had Korean citizenship or have one Korean parent or grandparent, the 3-year renewable F-4 visa allows its holders to enjoy all the privileges entitled to Korean citizens, except the right to vote.
While the lower and appeals courts ruled against Yoo, the Supreme Court sided with Yoo on the grounds that the consulate had not sufficiently exercised its discretionary power.
In July 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that the consulate’s decision rested solely on the Justice Ministry’s ban on Yoo. The highest court said the consulate had not looked into the reason behind the Justice Ministry’s decision, and it turned the case back over to the Seoul High Court.Government, public oppose Yoo’s return
On Friday, the Seoul High Court will rule once again on Yoo’s case. Considering the binding decision by the Supreme Court, the appeals court will likely uphold the top court’s ruling and ask the consulate to rethink the visa denial.
But the Korean government and public opinion remain adamantly against Yoon’s return.
“The overwhelming public sentiment is that Yoo can’t reenter the country,” said Ki Chan-soo, the commissioner of the Military Manpower Administration, at a parliamentary audit last month.
“While fully aware that the court has yet to award Yoo a final ruling, the way I see it is that his reentry is unlikely,” Ki said.
In July, just five days after the Supreme Court sent the case back to the appeals court for a review, an online petition against Yoo’s return at the Cheong Wa Dae website garnered more than 200,000 signatures, prompting the top office to respond.
“The government will decide on Yoo’s visa and reentry once the court renders its final ruling,” Cheong Wa Dae said. The presidential office will strive to create a culture of military service without foul play or special privileges, it added.
Even if the Seoul High Court honors the top court’s ruling and the consulate rethinks the matter of issuing an F-4 visa for Yoo, the consulate can still deny it on other grounds.
It can invoke a recently revised law that stipulates overseas Koreans cannot gain F-4 status if they are found to have obtained foreign citizenship to evade active duty.
The consulate can also argue that Korea has no obligation to extend to Yoo, a Korean American, the privileges commensurate with those enjoyed by its citizens. Instead, it can provide him with a more restrictive short-term stay or tourism visa.
By Choi Si-young (email@example.com